Paris, 1969–1974 – Simone de Beauvoir’s fight to tell Sartre’s truth
She wore black.
Not for convention—she had always hated the hollow ritual of mourning—but because it mirrored the emptiness inside her. It had been six months since they sent back his body, preserved in Soviet ice, with a single, typewritten note from the Czechoslovak Interior Ministry:
“Comrade Sartre expired from heart complications in a private medical facility outside Prague. The state regrets his passing.”
There was no cause to challenge it. No autopsy, no photographs, no room for protest. Even the coffin had been sealed shut.
But Simone de Beauvoir knew.
She knew he had died of humiliation.
1970: The Memoirs No One Wanted
She began to write immediately—late nights in the Rue de la Bûcherie apartment they had once shared, surrounded by yellowed papers and the books he had annotated before East Berlin swallowed him.
She called the memoir “Les Cendres de la Liberté”—The Ashes of Freedom.
It was not just a love letter, nor an elegy. It was a firebrand. She wrote of the coldness he encountered. The censorship. The turning of his words into Party-approved husks. The slow death of an existentialist in a collectivist cage.
And she named names. East German bureaucrats. Soviet censors. French intellectuals who had pushed him toward exile but refused to follow him there. The Nouvelle Gauche who still toasted his name in the cafés of Saint-Germain but knew nothing of the man he had become.
1971: The Backlash from the French Left
The reaction was immediate—and vicious.
Jean-Luc Godard called her book “bourgeois melodrama dressed up as dissent.”
Louis Althusser accused her of “hysterical revisionism,” arguing that Sartre’s final years were “his own conscious sacrifice to the socialist cause.”
French student groups who had idolized Sartre during the May ’68 protests now marched with signs that read:
“Simone Betrayed the Dream.”
“She Couldn’t Be the Wife of a Hero.”
Some even called her a CIA mouthpiece, accusing her of fabricating the details to discredit the USSR.
Her publisher, Gallimard, delayed the memoir’s release by nearly a year. Several editors resigned in protest. Only Le Monde Diplomatique dared to serialize excerpts—and even then, only in the back pages, under pseudonym.
The deepest wound came from the French Communist Party, which issued an official condemnation of her “defamation of a People’s State.” They declared Sartre’s exile “a voluntary act of revolutionary solidarity,” and suggested she had “emotionally distorted the narrative for personal and ideological reasons.”
It was the final fracture in the Left she had once called her family.
1973: The Lecture That Changed Nothing
She took to the stage at the Sorbonne in spring 1973, delivering what became known as “The Widow’s Address.”
“Jean-Paul Sartre was not a martyr, not a coward, and not a saint. He was a man who believed in freedom. And he died in a land where freedom was forbidden, by those who dared to call themselves its defenders.”
The crowd was divided. Some cheered. Others stood and turned their backs.
A reporter for L’Humanité called it “a bitter and failed attempt to claim ideological ownership of a man who belonged to the world.”
But Simone didn’t want to own him. She wanted him understood.
1974: A Lonely Legacy
When the memoir was finally released in full, it was quietly received. Reviews ranged from respectful to hostile. Sales were modest. Sartre’s name had become a myth too sacred to interrogate—and too inconvenient to mourn honestly.
Simone spent her final years more isolated than ever. Even her old companions from Les Temps Modernes had drifted away. She told one friend in confidence:
“They loved him more as a statue than as a man. I wrote about the man. So they tore me down.”
She never remarried. She never retracted a word.
Epilogue: A Truth Rediscovered
Only decades later, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, when the Czech archives were opened and unpublished letters of Sartre were discovered in the Stasi files, did the world begin to understand the depth of his isolation—and the accuracy of Simone’s account.
Her book, long out of print, was republished in 1991. It became a symbol not only of love, but of intellectual honesty in an age of ideological betrayal.
Simone de Beauvoir had not failed to be the wife of a hero.
She had succeeded in being the guardian of his humanity.
What If: The Archive 
Leave a comment